The Jamiat-e-Ulema-e-Islam–Fazl (JUI-F) and Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) have revived contacts with each other after three weeks.
According to details, PTI leader Asad Qaiser on Thursday called on JUI-F chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman at the latter's residence. Both the leaders exchanged views on the country's political situation and economy.
The matters in line with the country's constitutional and parliamentary matters were also underscored.
Qaiser had also apprised Rehman of the names for the PTI's negotiation committee. The JUI-F had also assured the PTI to constitute its negotiation committee soon.
Rehman, while confirming the contacts between the two parties (PTI, JUI-F), had said, "It will be decided during the negotiations that on which points both parties can join hands together."
It is up to PTI founder to decide Fawad Chaudhry's return: Qaiserf
Few days back, PTI leader Asad Qaiser said on that it is up to the party founder to decide the return of former federal minister Fawad Chaudhry."
Expressing his thoughts on Samaa TV, Qaiser took a dig at the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N). “The politics of the PML-N has come to an end. The PML-N will become the Pakistan Muslim League-Quaid (PML-Q) of the future,” he said.
"It was Nawaz Sharif's responsibility to realise that the PML-N lost elections and the PTI won elections," he said.
Qaiser slammed the PML-N, asserting, "The PML-N has lost its popularity. The party [PML-N] wants to bid farewell to the power."
Speaking about the situation in Punjab, Qaiser asserted: "There basic human rights are not being provided to the people in Punjab. Punjab has converted into the police state."
Qaiser said: "For us, the country comes first. We want to see the independent judiciary. We [PTI] are not having any doubts on the judges, but the government wants to bring the like-minded judges."
"The government will not be successful in banning the PTI," Qaiser said.
He added: "We are looking to see the ways that we can get rid of the incumbent government. The final decision has not been taken in line with bringing the vote of no-confidence motion."
